Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese panda coins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Merge to Chinese Silver Panda - CrazyRussian talk/email 01:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Chinese panda coins
Nothing but a list of years that particular coins were minted; not really any content NawlinWiki 00:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merege into Chinese Silver Panda. And make thinner, and more presentable. (Like, it might boil down to just a single sentence or two.) -- Mikeblas 00:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chinese Silver Panda and cleanup the list--TBC TaLk?!? 01:33, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per above and severely cut down, because it's just listcruft at present. SM247 My Talk  02:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom, Mikeblas. --Randy Johnston (‽) 02:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and then merge. -- Superbeatles 05:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * First, merging then deleting is easier than the other way around. Second, after the merge there's little harm in having this as a redirect. - Andre Engels 07:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, there's harm in not leaving a phrase as a redirect- you have to after content has been merged. -- Kicking222 12:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, a Delete and Merge vote is a violation of the GFDL and is not allowed. - CrazyRussian talk/email 01:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge, to Chinese Silver Panda and cleanup. --HolyRomanEmperor 10:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge, redirect, etc.--Atlantima 13:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. Zos 16:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per comments -- Alias Flood 02:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing merging into Chinese Silver Panda is wrong since panda coins come in gold, platinum, and palladium too. The article needs to grow, it's an under-served topic. Qwasty 07:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.