Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chintaman Rao Gautam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Chintaman Rao Gautam

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG WP:POLITICIAN Harsh (talk)  14:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 14:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 14:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep "members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature" pass POLITICIAN. He was "a member of the 1st Indian parliament", unless that is being disputed. Peridon (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Have been a member of Lok Sabha- Indian parliament.Shyamsunder (talk) 20:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * He has been an MP no doubt, but hasn't received significant press coverage . Harsh (talk)  05:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:POLITICIAN. (Its a good thing that he hasn't received significant press coverage. That means there is a possibility that he is not corrupt.) || || {T/C} 10:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Its a good thing that he hasn't received significant press coverage. That means there is a possibility that he is not corrupt That means, you believe he hasn't received significant press coverage. Hence, failing WP:GNG. possibility that he is not corrupt, PLEASE EXPLAIN how does not being corrupt justify that the article be kept? Harsh (talk)  10:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Per WP:POLITICIAN, he satisfies the condition of "member of a national, state or provincial legislature". Thats all that is needed for a politician to be to have an article on Wikipedia. He need not have huge press coverages of any sorts. And the whole small-font-bracketed statement was for humour. || || {T/C} 11:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:POLITICIAN (why this nomination?) state/national level elected legislature / representative. Rayabhari (talk) 05:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.