Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinthakayamanda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Mark Arsten under criterion G12 (unambiguous copyright infringement). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Chinthakayamanda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources other than a map. Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 17:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The nomination is too quick (only a day after the article is created). The article is about a geographical area and there is a long standing consensus that such articles are kept if existence is proven. (which is confirmed by this. Hence keep. The Legend   of Zorro  18:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. The place passess WP:GEOLAND. My only concern is that the current article is a near word-for-word copy from OneFiveNine.com • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looks like a population center to me. The AfD should neither have been created on a easily verified population center nor so fast after article creation.--Oakshade (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as a populated place. There is at least one gov.in source that backs this up, but it appears to publish a list of individuals' personal details, in a way that would breach data protection legislation in other countries, so I am not linking it in the article. AllyD (talk) 05:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a copyvio from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/villages/Anantapur/Yellanur/Chinthakayamanda -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.