Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinwendu Ihezuo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Chinwendu Ihezuo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 19:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 19.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete has not played at a level to meet notability guidelines for footballers. There is not enough coverage to pass GNG.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep she has played in a major senior tournament. this page shows her UEFA Women's Champions League appearances history.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  18:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - has played in the Champions League; the highest level of club competition Spiderone  18:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of any in-depth coverage by independent sources. Eldumpo (talk) 21:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Fails NFOOTY (keep comments that she has played in the champions league are unhelpful as they are not aligned to any guidelines. However, the player passes wider GNG. Significant, non-routine coverage can be found in the following sources amongst others:
 * Ajegunle boys made me fall in love with football — Ihezuo - lengthy interview with the player from The Punch, a long-standing Nigerian daily newspaper
 * PELICAN STARS PROUD OF IHEZUO ACHIEVEMENT - medium length article on her nomination as CAF female footballer of the year
 * Chinwendu Ihezuo delighted to join Falconets - brief article with quotes on her call up to the Nigeria U20 team
 * CHINWENDU IHEZUO Makes History With Nigeria - brief report on her record-breaking goal scoring feat
 * OFFICIAL: DELTA QUEENS FORWARD CHINWENDU IHEZUO COMPLETES MOVE TO BIIK KAZYGURT - medium length article on her move to Kazakhstan
 * Ihezuo, Ayinde to receive FIFA honours - brief article discussing her award of the U17 WC silver boot
 * On top of the lengthy interview and handful of medium length articles, there is a reasonable amount of match reporting of her international performances which would help flesh out the article. To my mind, BASIC is satisfied here. Fenix down (talk) 13:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Passes the WP:GNG bar. Edited article to make notability more clear from sources. --LauraHale (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Laura.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Fenix down, meets the GNG.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  13:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sources to pass GNG and Footy. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 17:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Champion's league performance clearly meets basic criteria for sports notability per WP:SPORTCRIT. WP:GNG also clearly met. WP: NFOOTY rarely applies to the majority of women's footballers except for players who play for a senior national team or 3 active "fully professional" leagues (Netherlands, Sweden, U.S.) although there are numerous top-division leagues around the world. Hmlarson (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.