Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chip Livingston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mike V • Talk 22:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Chip Livingston

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP, based entirely on primary sources with no evidence of reliable source media coverage shown, of a writer with no strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. A writer is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but must be properly sourced as having notability for more than just existing -- but nothing written or sourced here demonstrates that at all. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  02:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The links establish that his columns have been carried in various publications. However that is not enough to make him notable. When articles use the subjects own columnes to establish facts in the article that tells us that either the article is poorly written or that those are the best sources, which do not lead to passing GNG. The later seems to be the case here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.