Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chip tha Ripper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Chip tha Ripper
This artist has released a number of mixtapes, but I don't see any evidence of non-trivial coverage by third party publications or that he meets WP:MUSIC guidelines. JBsupreme (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  09:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I dont kno how to start a discussion on here. But i watch over all of chips social networks... what can i do to fix chips wiki so it follows the guidelines. The last thing i want is to have this account suspended. Alot of our fans rely on the wiki page and compliment it all the time, so we dont want to take that away from them. Everything on his page is accurate information, please let me kno what I am doin wrong, thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevslab (talk • contribs) 22:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Utterly fails WP:MUSIC. Just being accurate isn't enough, he has to have a chart single or multiple reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete He fails WP:Music on every count. A google news search  turned up one article where he receives significant coverage, but one article in a local paper does not pass WP:Music #1.  Vickser (talk) 03:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

The artist has lots of high-caliber collaborations, a chart single seems to be a matter of time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.230.52.227 (talk) 22:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.