Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chipmark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are rather thin on policy; see WP:ATA. Sandstein 21:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Chipmark

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no assertion of notability, orphan Will (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * Keep Article needs improvement Harlowraman 11:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral Can anyone find any reviews or something that'll attest notability? Corpx 16:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It looks like it has hundreds of hits on Google. It might not be the most popular social bookmarking solution, but it certainly is known. 23:31, 1 August 2007
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
 * Weak Delete. Article does not assert notability, and while it has many hits, notability is not the same as fame. I've found a few blog reviews--one stellar one by an individual who contributed to the project :)--but I haven't seen anything yet that seems to satisfy third party sourcing that would establish notability. --Moonriddengirl 15:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Class project lacking the sort of reputable independent sources to meet WP:VERIFY. Seattlenow 03:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.