Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chipmonk nest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. DS 01:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Chipmonk nest
The term "chipmonk nest" is a non-notable neologism used in one movie. It is not encyclopedic on its own and likely does not even merit inclusion in the Nacho Libre article. Hemlock Martinis 07:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Given no other reference for notability, I'd call this article patent nonsense. Autocracy 08:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not even spelled right! ObtuseAngle 15:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism which is not even a notable expression in the context of the movie it was supposedly taken from. --Metropolitan90 17:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Silly excuse for an article. Doesn't even clearly explain the subject (How exactly is using "Chipmonk nest" [sic] as a substitution for "cool" or "hip" a "play on words"?).  I suspect the author doesn't know quite know what a "play on words" really is. No sources given (and a Google search doesn't give any support for the term used in this context--even in the correct spelling).  Wavy G 19:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I could say redirect to Nacho Libre but that doesn't seem necessary. Lotusduck 19:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per pretty much everybody.Sarcasticidealist 22:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Horribly written, apparently the phrase, like any other phrase, can be used in several different ways - either as an insult, a compliment, maybe even a statement of fact. Seems the work of a precocious eight year old, or thereabouts. WP:SNOW? --Action Jackson IV 23:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.