Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chippy the Whittler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. The text of the article makes it clear that it's a speedy, really. Hedley 03:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Chippy the Whittler
Tagged for speedy delete as "nonsense, but does not IMO fit WP:PN. However, this seems to be an entirely non-notable work. It mentions no publicationn for the story, and the "movie" seems to be a self-pub, and the article mentions no distribution or sales, cites no reviews, etc. There are no google hits that I can find on this topic. It seems to be neither verifiable nor notable, and thus not encyclopedic. Delete unless relaible sources are cited for bi=oth the existance and the notability of this work. DES (talk) 00:05, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 00:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A movie with a budget of $8, and "most of the funding was spent on canvas leggings" sounds pretty nonsensical to me. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, zero Google hits. Hoax.  User:Zoe|(talk) 01:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a violation of WP:V and WP:NOT. Crotalus horridus (TALK ● CONTRIBS) 02:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Eight dollars would buy one pair of canvas leggings. Endomion 02:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.