Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chirp rate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Chirp. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹   19:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Chirp rate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page in only linked from one other page, Chirp, and it does not contain any information that is not already in Chirp or which cannot be easily inferred from the content of Chirp. DoctorTerrella (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 23:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 17:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Chirp. This is essentially just a definition, and I do not imagine it could be expanded with anything that would not fit perfectly well in the main article. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Chirp. I'm not sure why this is being considered for deletion; the topic is clearly verifiable in numerous RS and Chirp is an obvious merge target. There is academic work in chirp rate estimation, perhaps a standalone article could be written about this one day. But in the meantime, Chirp does not have a clear definition of chirp rate, so a merge is the best outcome for both articles. --Mark viking (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.