Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chisato Morishita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 08:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Chisato Morishita

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article cites no sources, only providing external links to online directories and the subject's blog. None are suitable for notability. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. Does not meet WP:NACTOR as roles are all minor. Does not meet the general WP:ENT either. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Alternative search terms:


 * Comment: She has quite an article on Japanese Wikipedia at ja:森下千里 and a search on her name returns an abundance of hits. Does nom speak/read Japanese? Which ATD solutions were sought here? Sam Sailor 00:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I only see a link to wikia on her article. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The ja.wiki article is equally inconvincing for notability; there's no case for WP:NACTOR and lacks WP:SIGCOV. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.