Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chithi Na Koi Sandesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whether or not to create a redirect is up to editors.  Sandstein  17:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Chithi Na Koi Sandesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable songs that fails WP:NSINGLE. Signature 13:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Signature 13:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Dushman (1998 film): It's not necessary for a song from a soundtrack to have its own article. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , What are you talking about? We have Mrs Robinson, What Would Brian Boitano Do?, and a lot more songs from soundtracks.  Kori das  talk?   02:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , per WP:NSONG, Songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Chithi Na Koi Sandesh is not a single. The song is part of the soundtrack of Dushman. Therefore, since the article is not notable enough, redirecting it to the film is the best option. So, don't bother arguing with me over this matter. I already have explained enough. So, I won't reply any further. My vote stands no matter what. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , But that's not even close to what you said. You said it's not necessary for a song from a soundtrack to have its own article, which I strongly disagree with. I was proving you wrong. I don't vote keep, I'm just disagreeing with your opinion.  Kori das  talk?   03:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , I don't mind if you agree or disagree with my views. When I said it's not necessary for a song from a soundtrack to have its own article, for me, that means that the song is not notable enough to have a stand-alone article. Unless there are enough independent sources about the song. Therefore, Songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article should redirect to another relevant article. So, no matter how many times you argue with me, it is really close to what I said. I really know what I'm saying here. I rest my case. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 04:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * BTW, if you're thinking of arguing with me any further, don't bother responding at all. This is not worth arguing since arguing with me over my views only makes matters worse. Everyone has his own views in every AfD. So, it's best to respect it than to waste time arguing over it. This discussion is over. I won't reply anymore. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 04:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Absolutely every single source is a passing mention.  Kori das  talk?   02:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.