Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chito Cleofas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Chito Cleofas

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

As the person proposing deletion said, "No evidence of notability. The only reference is to a promotional page." The prod was challenged by an IP that did not add any additional sources. The sourcing is still very weak, and the claim to notability is neither strong nor well-supported. Accordingly, the article should be deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 17:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 17:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Single source, fails WP:GNG. Tarc (talk)
 * Delete this completely non-notable wedding photographer per WP:SPAM. Wikipedia isn't the phone book. Qworty (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:GNG, very poorly sourced. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 20:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.