Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitti (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Enthiran. v/r - TP 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Chitti (character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There do not appear to be independent reliable sources that are substantively about this character that establish its notability separate from the film in which it appears. The sources that are out there appear to be primarily about the film (plot summaries and the like) and discuss the character only within the context of the film and not from the out-of-universe perspective required when writing about fiction. Fails WP:GNG, WP:PLOT and WP:FICT. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable fictional character, article fails to establish out of universe notability.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 00:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Enthiran. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Enthiran. I found a PopSci article about the robot, but it's not very long.  Still, he got "Robot of the Week", which I guess counts for something.  Besides that, I don't see anything else to help establish notability.  If someone else can find Indian sources, then that will do it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.