Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chivato


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Chivato

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and WP:NOTESSAY. When run through Google translate, this seems to be a (likely copyvio) dictionary definition and an unsourced essay. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 16:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

PAGE''' ]]) 20:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as the nomination describes, it is a dictionary definition plus essay about informants. It almost falls into A10 speedy deletion territory, since it does not add much that is not already covered at the informant article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Wrong language qualifies for WP:SPEEDY, plus copyvio argument... double speedy.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, technically, non-English articles only qualify for WP:SPEEDY if they already exist at a foreign language Wikipedia. Otherwise, they would get a notenglish tag and be deleted or moved to the appropriate language Wikipedia after two weeks if not translated. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.