Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chizer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Chizer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely fails GNG. Currently the article has a single unreliable source, when conducting a Google search I have found a single book that mentions the cross. Cavalryman (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. A topic has to be notable in order for it to be allowed in Wikipedia; the Eurohound isn't. Cavalarious (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Blocked sock. ST47 (talk) 02:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is NOT notable enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infantry-ician (talk • contribs) 01:58, 29 November 2019 (UTC)   Blocked sock. ST47 (talk) 02:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. That one book sits on a self-publishing facility.  William Harris Canis lupis track.svg talk Canis lupis track.svg 04:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.