Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloé Winkel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G5 -- see Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter Drmies (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Chloé Winkel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly-referenced stub on a non-notable actor, whose only claim to fame seems to be appearance in a (likely non-notable) film. The sources listed (not cited) are non-RS, and a search finds nothing beyond social media and directory listings. Fails WP:GNG / WP:NACTOR. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP:Basic or WP: GNG. No independent content that makes case for inclusion. NiklausGerard (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * "She was most notably known"--who writes that kind of stuff? Answer: a fan, or a sock, or both. Drmies (talk) 14:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.