Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Griffin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn due to sourcing improvements and change in page focus. Bearcat (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Chloe Griffin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a writer and artist, which makes no strong claim of notability for either endeavour. The only source here isn't about her, but merely namechecks her existence in an article that's otherwise about the subject of her book. As always, a person is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to verify that they exist — it takes substantive coverage in reliable sources supporting a credible claim of notability to get a person in here, but neither of those things are present in this article at all. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficient evidence of notability.  The Blue Canoe  23:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep, refocus and rename to Edgewise (book) per the significant coverage in reliable sources. I have rewritten the article.      </li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Edgewise: A Picture of Cookie Mueller to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 05:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)</li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, redirect to Edgewise as per . There are plenty of RS for the book. As an artist/writer, Griffin seems WP:TOOSOON. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti <sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk  20:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I see that essentially, this has already been rewritten and well-sourced into an article about the book, instead of a WP:BLP of its writer. On that basis, I'm going to withdraw this nomination and go ahead with the page move proposed by Cunard above. Thanks, y'all. Bearcat (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.