Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Lynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Chloe Lynn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I declined a CSD as this person appears to have starred in one notable film, but I don't think anything else. I'm a complete ignoramus to this topic (I prefer a nice cup of tea) so I'll leave it to the floor to decide what to do. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:38, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Pishcal  — ♣ 13:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Pishcal  — ♣ 13:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep " as this person appears to have starred in one notable film". If the film is notable the star is notable. Thank you Trout71 (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC) -vote struck - see below. Spartaz Humbug! 19:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * That supposed notable film appears to be a false positive blue link to a book series. Even if it were true, it would come up short on both the WP:PORNBIO and WP:NACTOR guidelines. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Retraction Sorry lads I didn't realise she was a porn star. I formally retract my keep vote. I though she was just a movie star. Thank you Trout71 (talk) 13:10, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unremarkable porn star. No claim of passing WP:PORNBIO with no awards or RS-acknowledged contributions to porn. Fails WP:GNG without reliable source coverage. I couldn't even find coverage in the porn trade press. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have adjusted the link in the article so it no longer points to an equally non-notable book series that the subject had nothing to do with. Subject has appeared in several run-of-the-mill porn movies.  No awards, no nominations, no press. Tarc (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * delete non notable, lacks sources and as a BLP requires much better sourcing then this. Spartaz Humbug! 19:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as unfortunately, sadly and with deep sadness fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.