Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Steele


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. JBW (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Chloe Steele

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable character. Citations are thin, similar to other Left Behind pages, and all of them go to "Critical reception"; however, these citations come from university studies. AdoTang (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 16:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The fact that the article already has some academic cites should give the nom a pause - and nothing in the nom suggests any sort of BEFORE was done. Coverage in Vincent (2010) and Freedman (2008) is one-sentence long or so, fails WP:SIGCOV. Shuck (2005) however has several paragraphs. Hungerford (2010) is in between. My BEFORE yielded 2+ paragraphs in this academic paper. There are hints there are more sources, I didn't complete the search, but I think this one is a keeper (almost certainly meets GNG). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC) PS. I'll ping User:Daranios in case they feel like rescuing this further, but IMHO it is acceptable already. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more time any thoughts on the sources identified by Piotrus?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.