Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Vevrier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No qualifying sources provided to establish notability per WP:GNG. ‑Scottywong | soliloquize _ 22:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Chloe Vevrier

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable pornographic model and former actress. See WP:PORNBIO. Coverage in reliable sources is scant and trivial to satisfy the general notability guidelines. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Vevrier is a well known dancer and model for two decades. Please see the article history. Nominations intended as wiki bullying should not be encouraged. NewExLionTamer (talk) 13:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per the nominator's well-reasoned arguments. The subject fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. No substantive GNews hits, virtually all relevant GBooks hits are self-published, typically compilations of Wikipedia articles. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Another impartial judge-! Thanks for getting involved again, your honest evaluation will be most helpful. NewExLionTamer (talk) 05:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable, clearly a spurious AFD. --62.163.152.44 (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some clear reliable sources that verify her notability then? Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. The article refers to her "breakthrough", but mysteriously never says what that was exactly. Tom Reedy (talk) 04:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep It should be noted that Morbidthoughts and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz have been editing this page for several years and only now deem it non-notable.

Perhaps the criteria should be changed to 'model' which is more suitable, more defining of her career and where she would be notable. The reason you can't back-up notability for Chloe under the pornstar criteria is because, well she isn't and mainly known as a natural erotic model.

She has appeared on Metro Tv's Naked New York in 2003 and Ksex radio which broadcasted in Los Angles also in 2003- both of which have video documentation on Chloes' official website chloevevrier.com members area. She has appeared in over 400 magazines and wrote the forward (also appears on the cover) for Tom King's 'Busty' book and appeared on the cover of Lisette Ashton's 'Forbidden Reading' both published in 2006. Additionally, she was a regular writer/columnist for Danni.com from 1998-2002 writing over 25 articles for her 'School of Love' column. She is an active writer/photographer contributor for Bachelor Magazine in Japan. Chloe has reported on serveral erotic conventions worldwide and contributed a documentary report on the World Erotic Art Museum published in September 2007 for Bachelor. She is the longest active, large natural breast model and most published worldwide of all time. You may not find direct reliable link sources for the aforementioned but its factual, the data exists (in print media) and she is a notable person on this planet due to prolific contributions to the field of entertainment.

WP:NMODEL WP:ANYBIO

http://www.gingerlynn.com/ksex/index.html http://nymag.com/metrotv/nakedny/ http://chloefanclub.com/ http://www.amazon.com/Busty-Nexus-Tom-King/dp/0352340320 http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Reading-Nexus-Lisette-Ashton/dp/0352340223 http://models.danni.com/models/mod117.html http://www.weam.com/web/index.php?categoryid=13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1love4all (talk • contribs) 18:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * delete Non-notable — and yes WP:PORNBIO are stricter now. BO ; talk 18:54, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.