Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chołod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Chołod

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable book, being nominated for a bookstore's best-seller list isn't notable for Wikipedia. I find no critical reviews of the work either. Oaktree b (talk) 04:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Rellisting to consider additions by User:Paradygmaty to the article and whether that helps establish notability for this book. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I do not agree with the nominator's statement. As a Polish speaker, I would like to point out that the book received a lot of attention. In addition, it was written by an author of box office hits. It meets the stricter standards of the Polish Wikipedia, and I believe it will also meet the standards of the English Wikipedia. I completed the section on reception today, pointing out several reviews and notices by serious Polish media. Paradygmaty (talk) 06:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 04:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Forbes and Kultura Liberalna reviews meet the two reviews necessary for WP:NBOOK (and it looks like there are more too). Thanks Paradygmaty for adding those to the article. ~ L 🌸  (talk) 07:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Sources added by Paradygmaty seem to satisfy WP:NBOOK. ARandomName123 (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.