Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choa Kok Sui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Choa Kok Sui
Not-notable. Though the article claims this person has written a bunch of books, the author doesn't even show up on a google book search. He is widely publicised on his own groups webpages but I can't find anyone else talking about him, except the odd forum post saying he's a cult leader. I think it's a closed circle religious sect. There is an editor around calling him Master who appears to belong. Related pages in this AfD are Pranic healing and Arhatic Yoga, which also fall under non-notable. The Arhatic Yoga article has already been deleted once because it was simply a reproduction of the sects own website. All articles have been tagged for cleanup/advertising problems for a while but nothing came of it. I suspect there'll be some activity after this AfD but I am doubtful it will change the un-notable nature of the articles. Metta Bubble 09:44, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Metta Bubble 09:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong 11:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 15:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn cult advertisement.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Deletehmm, too minor topic. If the article stays, it will likely to become promo platform for the group because no one will check for NPOV. It is o.k. to resurrect it when the group become famous (or infamous). :D
 * Delete per nom. ThePromethean 2006-02-25
 * Comment. This nom should probably include Meditation on the Twin Hearts also. Peace. Metta Bubble 13:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

a comment from a guy who uses wiki to gain knowledge everyday.

dont delete article because its not notable enough, any article infact, as far as pranic healing goes, its not a cult, i have attended a few classes and there is reason in it (thats what i think), i would like to say with as much of a neutral stand point as i can that some of the teachings work in real life, he teaches to make donations, meditate, help people, those are the teachings, as far as the debate on how true scientifically the methods of healing are thats upto the research minds who will draw out a conclusion once they perform exhaustive amount of tests. the teachings are simple rules in life thats my opinion.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.