Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chobham (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator has provided a keep !vote indicating withdrawl; no non-!keep votes. The Bushranger One ping only 13:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Chobham (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Please refer to Talk:Chobham. You will see that Chobham, like Derby, is about the place itself. Rightly, I believe, this has changed, due to other editor's actions and the principles articulated at Derby and elsewhere in policy. - Adam37   Talk  15:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep: The dab page is redundant to the hatnote at Chobham except for the see also Cobham (disambiguation). If this dab is deleted, we lose a link to a set of items with a similar spelling. Chris857 (talk) 15:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * After Peter James's post, and looking, we now have 6 items named Chobham, so we need a dab page. Changed to Keep. Chris857 (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Talk:Chobham is a redirect, which I've tagged for deletion to move the article's talk page; there's a comment at Talk:Chobham (disambiguation) but I can't see a reason for deletion. I agree that "armo(u)r" is usually included in the name of Chobham armour but it's plausible without; there's also Chobham F.C. Peter&#160;James (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: I have cleaned up the dab page per WP:MOSDAB - it previously linked to the primary topic Surrey town through a redirect. The hatnote there could be probably trimmed, but the dab page is valid and useful.  Pam  D  13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It is now PamD, however, many of the articles there would be very rare to be abbreviated, as I am sure you agree.  As for the use of the word town, that is quite different from a village in the UK so that has been corrected. -  Adam37   Talk  18:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.