Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate.js


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Chocolate.js

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NSOFT not established. Has one non-affiliated source, an interview with its maker. The only other thing I could find on Google is this page, which only has a screenshot and a link, so it hardly constitutes significant coverage. Google's result pages are cluttered by WordPress blogs with the chocolate theme; DuckDuckGo found some Chinese pages that I couldn't read.

FWIW, the GitHub page for chocolate.js has only 146 stars and its Twitter account has 3 followers. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 12:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  14:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete - software article lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Ref provided is from a company blog, and not RS. A search turned up no RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.