Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate muffin

Chocolate muffin was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE THEN CREATE AS A REDIRECT

I suppose there may be some people who are interested in this subject matter. However, it is definitely not at the correct title, and even if it is, disambiguation is needed. A further objection is that the web site this article describes cannot - at least, not at present - be accessed and may therefore be said not to exist. Deb 18:13, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * the site is: http://www.chocolatemuffin.co.uk/ Ianb 15:55, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * delete as vanity and then create redirect to muffin. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 20:39, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's fantastically local.  They describe which towns hate them.  Not particularly regional, is it? Geogre 21:23, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable or vanity (take your pick.) A google search can't distinguish this site from the edible snack of the same name.  --Ardonik 00:06, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, yet another group of young people and their video camera, irrelevant. Ianb 15:55, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete the moment the five days are up. Calling it "irrelevant" is almost paying it a compliment. - Lucky 6.9 18:16, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)