Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate sandwich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:24, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Chocolate sandwich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG as there are insufficient reliable sources to support notability. I found (and resurrected via Webarchive) one dead link to a 2004 newspaper article, but a current search yielded no other mentions of this dish. The only other reference in the article as it stands is a recipe. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 20:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Time magazine, Telegraph, Telegraph, Times of India, Times of India, Seventeen, Telegraph, NCBI, SMH, SMH. Notable overview topic of other notable chocolate sandwiches, e.g. chocolate sandwich cookies/cakes/crackers/biscuits, sliced chocolate. w umbolo   ^^^  12:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - really the article doesn't do it justice. It's beyond me, Geoff, how your WP:BEFORE check didn't come up with more sources, covering a range of aspects on the overall chocolate sandwich title. More than enough for a keep. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:53, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Beats me as well. I really looked and don't know how I missed articles like those mentioned by Wumbolo. I tend to approach these sorts of articles trying to save them first and only nominating when I can't find good sources to add. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 21:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.