Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choi Youngjae (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete his group is notable; he alone is not. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Choi Youngjae
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As was the case before, this member has no solo work only group work. There is nothing notable that could be put on this page that isn't already on the Got7 group pages. Peachywink (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Peachywink (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Peachywink (talk) 13:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Per A7. He's not notable outside of his current group. It lookslike nothing has changed since the previous AfD last year. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 *  Delete  not notable enough Daniel kenneth (talk[&section=new + ]·[ tag]·contribs ·deleted contribs ·[ logs]·[ filter log] ·block user ·[ block log]·SUL·CA·[ checkuser] ([ log])) 14:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete again. This was deleted before, so it should be now. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete perhaps as he's certainly still questionable for solid independent notability, seems best known for the group. SwisterTwister   talk  04:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. He is not individually notable. Random86 (talk) 06:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, speedy close, redirect to group's article. This is not a genuine deletion discussion, but a content dispute over whether the subject should be covered in an independent article or within the group article. Bringing it to AFD just wastes the community's time. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I did that two weeks ago and the page came back 6 days later. Aside from the fact that I don't know much about speedy deletion (and you deleted the other editors attempt at one and called them incompetent), it is clear that a few people disagreed with the old decision as the second speedy deletion attempt was also removed.  I thought getting fresh consensus would be best but unfortunately none of the articles editors have chosen to participate. Peachywink (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Non-notable, should not have come to AfD. JMHamo (talk) 00:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I wasn't trying to create a longer process but two previous attempts by another editor to do a speedy delete were removed so I thought this was the best way to get consensus.Peachywink (talk) 14:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Obviously non notable, Wasn't notable last year and sure as shit isn't notable now. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.