Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choke the Word


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 08:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Choke the Word

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Local band of questionable notability. Google news search on "Choke the Word" Denver shows zero results. Standard search shows a lot of primary sources, unreliable sources and social media, but little significant coverage from independent reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Article Improvements:
 * I'm in the process of expanding and updating the article. I've made a couple of changes so far, and will make more over the next couple of days. XON2000 —Preceding undated comment added 07:24, March 21, 2012‎ (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Awards not major. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacking any in-depth, independent, reliable coverage. Its claim to be the first group to fund an album using their fans is not borne out by the blog sources. Sionk (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not finding significant coverage for this group in reliable sources; does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 04:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.