Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chondath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Forgotten Realms nations. I'm not sure what use it will be as a redirect, but redirects are cheap. The material already seems to be at the target, so I can't justify ignoring the consensus to delete first. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 00:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Chondath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This doesn't establish notability. The current "reception" sources is trivial and doesn't provide any particular context of importance. TTN (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to List of Forgotten Realms nations. BOZ (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete basically almost no coverage outside of game aids. One single sentence mention in a game review.  This fictional country in the Forgotten Realms setting of D&D does not rate a redirect, much less an article.  Fails WP:GNG.  --Bejnar (talk) 20:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no notability established. The content is largely uncited original research and trivia. The only 3rd party, independent sourced content is is this:
 * Trenton Webb, in his review of the book The Vilhon Reach for British RPG magazine Arcane, described the nation: "In a Soviet fashion, Chondath is a belittled ex-empire humbled by its own experiments with magic of mass destruction and expansionist greed. Now the satellite states that were once united by their fear of Chondath are nervously vying for prominence during its decline."[1]
 * This is just a description of the war, but does not offer any encyclopedically relevant analysis of its significance in popular culture. There's nothing to merge here, hence delete, and optionally redirect name only. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.