Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chongqing No.68 Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 19:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Chongqing No.68 Middle School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable middle school. Unsourced and no claims of significance or importance. Was first PRODed but redirected per policy recommendations to its locality, but the redirect was reverted without discussion by the the creator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Middle school with no indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no claim to notability. Also, WP:MACHINETRANSLATION as the exact text is obtainable from the Chinese language Wikipedia. Jack N. Stock (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Or, if the creator proises not to pish about with it, redirect per WP:ATD. But if they won't, we have to remove the opportunity to do so. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap shit room 15:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable, probably speedy material both G11 and G12, per Jack's finding that it's an exact machine translation from Chinese Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 16:25, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only marginal claim to notability is statement "one of the ten most influential middle schools in Chongqing", but claim of being influential isn't demonstrated nor qualified as to how it's influential. Regardless of quality of the claim, the entire article is unsourced, failing to substantiate the claim. The article for the city also lists three middle schools (including this one) in section labelled "Notable middle school and high schools", but notability is likewise unsourced there, so if article is deleted, recommend removing mention from that article as well. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I would have supported REDIRECT but Since the REDIRECT per policy has been made into article again hence suggesting delete. Notability not eshtablished and unable to find it either. -- D Big X ray  16:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable middle school. Meatsgains (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW  VitalPower | talk  20:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - read through the Chinese wikipedia article as a native Chinese reader and speaker, that article if using English wikipedia policies will be a straight G11. --Quek157 (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, my reading of the Chinese one is on the zh, zh-ch (classical one) if applied here is an A1. --Quek157 (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.