Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chongqing Xianghong TV Art Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Chongqing Xianghong TV Art Ltd
Orphaned AfD nomination. I'm pretty sure that it has been nominated for lacking notability and failing WP:CORP. Technical nomination - no opinion from me as yet.➨  ЯEDVERS  18:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete no reliable sources for any claim to notability, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP, reads as advertriial. Just zis Guy you know? 12:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even simplified to "Chongqing Xianghong", it gets a whopping 14 Google hits. Kill it. Kafziel 16:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Unfortunately, Chinese google for "重庆乐乐熊" gets only 41 as well.  Not much in the way of news either.  --ColourBurst 20:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep probably better get someone who can read Chinese. The article claims to have produced The Story Inside Forest and Happy Panda and claims Happy Panda is notable among children.  Better research better into this before deleting. --HResearcher 03:24, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe someone else can come up with something, but for me these claims are 100% unverifiable. Those unsourced claims of notability serve to keep it from Speedy Deletion, but they shouldn't serve to keep it from being deleted here. I can find no evidence that they have produced anything of note, and the external link is in Chinese (and even if it wasn't, it's not a source independent of the subject, so it couldn't be used anyway). If the subject's notability can't be verified, it can't survive AfD. Kafziel 12:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Technically, translation from other Wikipedias is allowed, from Countering Systemic Bias here:, so technically it has to be nonnotable in every single wikipedia to be truly nonnotable (not just "being a Chinese website with little hits in English".) However, there's no verification of the character or the company in Chinese news sources either.  --ColourBurst 17:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete; fails WP:V. --Satori Son 16:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as it has no verified sources provided and as per ColourBurst - "there's no verification of the character or the company in Chinese news sources either".--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.