Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choo Choo (Top Cat character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was MERGE to Top Cat. However, I do not think the material in this article is worth merging, so I'm just going to redirect and someone can fish out the stuff they like if they want to.-Splash - tk 18:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Choo Choo (Top Cat character)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As fancruft. No external notability. Martijn Hoekstra 19:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Merge per BillCJ below-- θnce θn this island Speak! 19:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.   jj137  ( Talk ) 20:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 *  Keep or Merge - As nominated, this is not a genuine issue, and is a frivolous nom. Character articles are very common for TV shows, both aninmated and live-action. This article does need verifiable sources, but I believe such sources exist, and that this can be remedied in due course. Note: This nomination was filed 20 minutes after the articles creation, with no attempts made to comunicate with the article's creator beforehand, as recommended by Deletion Policy, and by the spirit of WP:AGF. Could be merged back to Top Cat, as that article has no character details, or to a new article covering all the characters. - BillCJ 20:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Adjusted vote to straight Merge - Merge to main article, and split off chacater section IF it becomes lengthy, and if it has notable content. - BillCJ 20:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Top Cat per BillCJ. STORMTRACKER   94  21:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NOT and WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy 22:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge as is normal practice for character stubs in series like this. Grutness...wha?  00:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no merge. There's nothing worth merging here. Crazysuit 02:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per BillCJ. Edward321 03:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Quasirandom 22:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:FICT into Top Cat. —Quasirandom 22:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: That's right, we must delete this trivial article that's only useful to a few thousand people in order to save electrons. Remember, save those electrons, they're more important than you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.148.100 (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply to comment. Merging retains the information those people may find useful, and puts it in a place where they are more likely to be able to find it, while retaining a redirect from the current location. It isn't electrons that are being saved - it's just a bit of searching by people looking for information that's being reduced. Grutness...wha?  23:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.