Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choodiyan (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Choodiyan (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG––currently the article is supported by an article in The Hindu and another from The Hindu Businessline. The former is a routine announcement of Sony Entertainment Television's then-new show lineup, the latter gives three sentences of coverage in an article giving an overview of various then-currently running TV shows. I was unable to find additional sources online, but may have missed something due to language barriers.

Previously nominated via PROD by User:Lord Bolingbroke, dePROD by User:Najam us Saqib who said The show is very old so limited online sources are available for it. The sources which are added i think are enough and there is no need to propose the page for deletion since the show is very much popular and needed to be their on wekipedia for the the people who are following. However, I would disagree with the assertion that the currently provided sources demonstrate notability, as they contain rather trivial and routine coverage. If the show is truly very popular, then there should be more sources that could be provided, and the fact that the show only ran for one year is not a great sign. signed,Rosguill talk 20:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as PROD nominator and per the explanation given by Rosguill. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Rosguill I have added some references,if finds more will add them.The show is also available on IMDb which depicts its notability.And about runtime its a finite show.So i think there is no need to propose the article for deletion,it deserves to be on Wikipedia. signed,Najam us Saqib talk 17:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't think the sources you've added contribute to notability, as they appear to be an excerpt from the show and a blog post, (not reliable, see WP:BLOGS). Furthermore, IMDb is not a reliable source as it is crowdsourced, and it actually has earned a spot as an unreliable source on the perennial reliable sources list. What I would like to see would be magazine or newspaper articles reviewing the show or discussing at length. For more information on notability guidelines, see WP:N, and for information on reliable sources, see WP:RS. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Rosguill Cited reference which reviews the show and news articles about the show are already cited in 1st two references.More newspaper references will be difficult to find because of the age of the show, mostly newspapers have deleted it from their database and showing error loading the page.Hope u understand, and i would once again say that i think cited references are enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Najam us Saqib (talk • contribs) 08:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * As Rosguill mentions above, the first two sources do not provide significant coverage of the show—both are routine coverage that only mention the show in passing. The reviews website that you've added is a self-published source with user generated content, so it also cannot establish the show's notability. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:TVSERIES for having aired on national television station. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.