Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chooka Parker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to  Australia's Got Talent (season 5). There was strong consensus that there should not be an article on this subject, however, there was really no consensus to delete. Therefore, I've defaulted to redirect as the less restrictive of the options. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Chooka Parker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable reality TV show contestant. Ozurbanmusic (talk) 11:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ozurbanmusic (talk) 07:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 08:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The information could easily be incorporated into the article below by merging it, and has been documented in multiple, reliable sources. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. Jenks24 (talk) 01:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with this, but that doesn't mean the information needs to be deleted. I think the information on the subject would be more appropriately placed in the season's "Audition" section. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the show, valid search term. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails because this is a non-notable, unimportant person, and I say that in the nicest way possible 11coolguy12 (talk) 12:06, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The subject does appear to have notability for the event, as he is covered in multiple sources as I mentioned below. Also, your arguments that the subject is "not important" do not help your case.  Please read WP:NOTIMPORTANT to understand what I mean. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears that reading WP:NOTIMPORTANT doesn't help User:I Jethrobot's case. BusterD (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Duffbeerforme. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep on the basis of good worldwide references. Five out of the six refs are reliable.--Dmol (talk) 08:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Australia's Got Talent (season 5) per Duffbeerforme. this and this article, both from Australian sources, seemed provide some evidence of notability, albeit it does appear to be a case of WP:BLP1E.  The appropriate information can get merged to the above section in the article. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RECENTISM and WP:BLP. Sources are insubstantial and mostly blogs. No direct detailing, just a bunch of trivia. Nothing to merge to the show and no place to target (unless we're talking about sourcing this completely uncited list of living people). If Kylie Minogue voted for him in the final, it's possible he's got a music career in his future, which means better sources, which means eventually we may be proven wrong. But that's all WP:CRYSTAL. As of this timestamp, the decision should be delete (and redirect to the show as a relevant search term). BusterD (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Australia's Got Talent (season 5) as a valid search term. Failing that delete. This is a WP:BLP1E situation - after such reality/talent show appearances there is always a transient burst of publicity but something more lasting is needed for notability. Bridgeplayer (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.