Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chow Ching Lie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Chow Ching Lie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Is this writer/pianist sufficiently notable? Nothing in the article shows that she is. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * As per WP:BEFORE, what efforts did you undertake to investigate the notability of this person? - Mgm|(talk) 09:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google news archive search shows that the subject is notable as an author, in that her autobiography is described as a best-seller, and under the general notability guideline in that a notable feature film has been made about her life. If those result aren't enough then there are many more from Google Books. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not famous, all of her bibliography are red link. 98.119.177.171 (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Phil Bridger. Edward321 (talk) 02:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, look at Edward's comment.--hnnvansier (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. See French Wikipedia for an extensive biography with many references. As per Mgm, AfD is not the same as cleanup. betsythedevine (talk) 02:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. For gosh sakes, she is notable enough that her bography was made into a film. Darn easy to source.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.