Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowbus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the sources found by Cunard show the article can be improved. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Chowbus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough sources to back up the page. Only four are not enough. Akronowner (talk) 12:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Akronowner (talk) 12:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * COMMENT: fails the SIRS test but can be kept once it is met. The Ace in Spades (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC) — The Ace in Spades (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Waskerton (talk • contribs).
 * Comment Agree with the above, more sources would help. Oaktree b (talk) 15:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG: 1. Customers of food delivery app Chowbus had their home addresses leaked. The breach appears to have affected hundreds of thousands of users. - Business Insider 2. Asian Food Delivery Service Arrives in San Diego - Eater San Diego 3. A delivery service for Asian restaurants launches in Houston - Houston Chronicle SK2242 (talk) 18:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  </li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Chowbus to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 12:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * Keep, with the caveat that an editor adds at least some of the sources to the stub, per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep has shown enough coverage to pass WP:GNG.Less Unless (talk) 16:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Cunard's sources above fail WP:NCORP which is the relevant guideline for companies since they're all based on company announcements. Not a single reference meets WP:ORGIND. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 18:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.