Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrecessmas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Chrecessmas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD contested by author, who admits the quoted blog is the only source they can find. I can't find any reliable sources, so I don't see it as notable. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Georgia guy (talk) 19:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. A whopping three Ghits: one Wikipedia, two blogs. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It's clearly not a G1, as it is in plain English, so I have removed that tag - and I really don't see any other categories it would fit. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I prod2ed it (my spell checker didn't object to prod2ed - weird) saying that while I quite liked the source, this was no way Wikipedia material. I stand by that. BTW - here in the UK I get 2 Wikipedia hits, one blog and one personal site. (The second WP is a user who seems to get all the AfDs listed somehow.) Peridon (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly made up one afternoon, and not picked up by any reliable source; compare Festivus or Kwanzaa. Bearian (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.