Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Albano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Chris Albano

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod (possible sockpuppets). This is a vanity article. It is non-neutral in tone and contains unverified claims. Apart from the subject's own statement that he is notable there is nothing to support a claim of notability per WP:NN - "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" andy 23:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Appears to be non notable, and as vanity. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:ADVERT, and WP:NN. --Brewcrewer 01:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Weak keep as possibly notable, but needs a lot of cleanup of peacock language. Rescue? Bearian 01:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Brewcrewer who is if anything generous in his comments. Springnuts 12:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete:Vanity not notability I think Victuallers (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Keep as it does seem to have enough references to establish notability. Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - actually it only has two references (I have just removed two others which were devoid of any information about Chris Albano). Both are uncritical descriptions of some recipes and don't do anything to establish notability - no reviews, comparisons, awards etc. On this basis every chef and every restaurant that gets a mention in any medium (radio, newspaper, blog...) is notable - i.e. most of the food industry of the developed world. andy (talk) 12:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.