Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Cook (energy market strategist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Chris Cook (energy market strategist)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Given this article has had verification issues for nearly 12 years, and the fact that none of the sources satisfy WP:GNG mostly because they either lack WP:DEPTH or aren't independent. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Owen&times;  &#9742;  13:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I found one article on G-Scholar that he co-authored that has >400 cites, but nothing else that would meet NACADEMIC. In general searching, beyond the usual LinkedIn and Youtube entries, I found only a few interviews, and some notices of talks. Nothing indicated GNG. Lamona (talk) 15:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.