Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Corner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 18:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Chris Corner

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." - wp:v -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-10-04t13:19z 13:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: "A topic is presumed to be notable enough to merit an article if it meets the general notability guidelines below." S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 13:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you read the rest of the wp:n guideline, which states "General notability guideline If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article."? Chris Corner has zero footnoted references, and of the 5 external links 4 are not "independent of the subject" and the 5th is 404. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-10-04t21:01z
 * Keep - Ghits seem to show a fair number of interviews and articles about the subject. Just for the record: The GNG says If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article., but it doesn't say the converse. From p-->q, you can't deduce ¬p-->¬q See logical implication. -- Cycl o pia -  talk  23:46, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep A lot of reliable and substantial third-party sources even in the Czech language. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.