Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Corradino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW Missvain (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Chris Corradino

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article. Even if the subject were notable, WP:TNT would apply. But cannot see enough in the article or elsewhere to pass WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 22:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete the text of the article says it all: he's notable for being .. a good instructor. The sourcing is uniformly terrible as well. Curiocurio (talk) 23:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not sure the New York Institute of Photography where he is/was an instructor is notable either, altho it has an article. It is not to be confused with the International Center of Photography in New York which is indeed notable, and runs a school, a museum and houses an archive. Netherzone (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think even one of the article's 27 source qualifies as a reliable source. Also, I agree with what Curiocurio said. Possibly (talk) 01:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article is highly promotional; heavily edited by a couple of anonymous single purpose editors WP:SPA. The subject does not meet the criteria for notability as per WP:GNG nor WP:ARTIST nor WP:NPROF. Netherzone (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional puff piece of someone who has no notability.  Schwede 66  15:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Quite promotional fails in passing WP:GNG. Akronowner (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV, above discussion, and especially and . Reasonable Wikipedians disagree whether Al Jazeera is a reliable source, but none of the others are. New York Institute of Photography is not really a gallery -- it's a for-profit college -- while International Center of Photography was notable (although it moved off the beaten path as the Covid-19 pandemic struck NYC and hasn't re-gained an audience yet). In any case, he's plainly not notable. Bearian (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete it is high time we rid Wikipedia of promotionalist junk.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above discussion. No wide coverage and no reliable sources. Does not come close to meeting WP:GNG standards. The article is nothing but fluff. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 03:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.