Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Day (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Chris Day (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by WP:SPA. He is a town supervisor and unsuccessful congressional candidate. All sourcing is local. Does not pass WP:POLITICIAN and his military service does not pass WP:SOLDIER either. Rusf10 (talk) 00:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 06:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 06:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * This was the authors only article and he edited no other articles at all (Special:Contributions/RocklandWatch) staying on the site for only 20 minutes 4 years ago, however you shouldn't brand every editor who only edited one article as an SPA. Nothing on the Single-purpose account suggests that this would be an SPA. Prince of Thieves (talk) 11:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Editors that busy themselves on only one subject are, by definition, single-subject or single-purpose accounts, although they might indeed not strictly qualify for the WP admonitions on SPAs. -The Gnome (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I see. Prince of Thieves (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * delete SPA or not, this reads like a brochure from the failed campaigns. I see no real notability here. Mangoe (talk) 18:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete don't need to even consider the SPA account as he fails WP:POLITICIAN and his failed other political run didn't get him past WP:GNG.
 * Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. non-notable subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Prince of Thieves (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neither being a town supervisor nor being an unsuccessful candidate for Congress is grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself, but there's no other notability claim here and not nearly enough reliable sourcing to deem him a special case. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete We have come to realize that being a candidate for congress alone is not justification for having an article, nor is being a town supervisor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.