Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Denney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Chris Denney

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ATHLETE, didn't play one game in the NFL according to this af2 isn't fully profesional Delete Secret account 20:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  21:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable as an athlete or otherwise.  Grsz 11  23:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral. In 2008, Denney was named the MVP and leading scorer of the af2 arena football league, as reflected in these two press reports: "Playmaker honored" ("Arkansas receiver Chris Denney has been named af2 Playmaker of the Year. Denney played just 11 games, but still managed to lead the league with 274 points, posting 45 touchdowns and scoring at least three times in every game.") and "Chris Denney Named Cutters Playmaker of the Year".  Not knowing anything about this league, I'm neutral.  MVP and top scorer are impressive honors, and both the the league (af2) and Denney's team (Arkansas Twisters) do have wikipedia articles.  If the league and the team are notable, might not the league MVP and high scorer also be notable.  Anyone know more about af2 that bears on Denney's notability? Cbl62 (talk) 01:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I know that the af2 is a semi-proffesional minor league of the Arena Football League, usually semi-proffesional players doesn't meen notability guidelines. Secret account 14:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.