Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Duffy (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Chris Duffy (photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG with no reliable secondary sources, just Duffy's own books and a Wordpress blog interview. No assertion that Duffy meets the special cases of WP:ARTIST. McGeddon (talk) 10:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Obvious self-promotion. Truth to the Fourth Power (talk) 05:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not inheritied (literally, I suppose). Not seeing much coverage of the younger Duffy's work. Perhaps a case could be made if the Bowie book had been more widely discussed. —  Noah  21:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.