Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Fenn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted.  Majorly  (o rly?) 20:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Chris Fenn

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not noteworthy enough, unsourced JameiLei 18:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I would personally have gone with a speedy deletion tag  . But yes, delete.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 18:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I think you guys should wait a bit for stuff to be added to this article before deletion--Wbfanatic234 18:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I quote: "Chris Fenn is an new wakeboarder to the scene and with out websites like this we would not be able to create enough interest in him to get him signed by a company." QED.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 18:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Changed to Speedy Delete - as I nominated this article for deletion in the first placeJameiLei 18:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC) The Speedy Delete was contested. The debate will resume here. JameiLei 18:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Content is clearly db-bio.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. The article confirms the subjects lack of notability with phrases such as 'He is expected to start competng on the pro wakeboard tour early next year'. Nuttah68 18:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You should leave it as speedy. It is the editor who contests' responsibility to state their argument on the articles talk page.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 18:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Also,It could be db-spam.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I started it as this so it might as well stay as this. Also its easier to get a clear decision here cause of the voting system. JameiLei 11:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * He's even vandalising his own articles now. Can we please either have this resolved, or go to speedy delete to get rid of this blasted nonsense for good  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 19:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) Speedy delete, the sooner the better. RJASE1 Talk  19:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.