Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Fuhrmeister


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   SPEEDY DELETE. J I P | Talk 07:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Chris Fuhrmeister

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced WP:BLP that has either no mention of, or weak mention of, notability. Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 05:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable. I live in Bloomington, and know a lot of musicians here, and I have never heard of this guy.  I doubt he's even notable enough to be listed in Bloomingpedia.  Why is this not speedied as db-bio? ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  05:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't speedy it because it seemed to make a claim of notability with "one of the most talented music producers to attend Indiana University." It's not verifiable, but it is a claim, and that's all WP:CSD requires. -- Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 05:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Would a prod have been appropriate then? It seems pretty open and shut as it stands. Maccy69 (talk) 05:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but that's mostly irrelevant now. The end result is the same.... -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 05:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete unreferenced, non-notable (Google just returns facebook etc.) Looks like a student making his own vanity page. Should probably have been tagged as a speedy. Maccy69 (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. In my view, completely unsourced, unelaborated claims that a subject is "famous" shouldn't defeat speedy, but others' mileage may vary.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 06:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Article makes a vague assertion of "talent," but no assertion of notability. Being bold, I have nominated it for A7. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 06:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.