Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Galya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Jessie (TV series). v/r - TP 01:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Chris Galya

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD deleted. Not notable per WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Only one marginally significant recurring role, no indication of fan base or cult following, has made no unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. No significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - And I'm usually the #1 defender of keeping new bio articles for new Disney Channel stars, but (aside from a few Disney press releases listing the cast of Jessie) I can only find a couple reliable sources mentioning him working as a model a few years ago. Not a single interview with him to provide even the most basic info, such as date/place of birth, etc., so a "bio" here is really premature.  What little info was included in the creation of his page here is already listed (more concisely, without spelling/punctuation errors, etc) on IMDb.  We all know that by this time next year, he'll most likely be considered "notable" enough to start a page, but right now, he's not even one of the "leading" actors on Jessie, he's "recurring" and has not appeared in most episodes of the show so far.  It's nothing personal - but Wikipedia's notability guidelines are pretty clear - If he was part of the "main" cast or if there was even one reliable source providing some basic info like a birthday, how he got into acting/modeling, etc, then I could argue to keep it, but when even I can't make a case to keep an article - that's a sure sign that the page is dead in the water.  I suggest any pages that mention him can be blue-linked to his IMDb page until we have something about him besides a Filmography.  I personally use date of birth as a jumping off point.  If you don't even have a DOB, you don't have the first building block to a bio page IMO, with extremely rare exceptions, such as when an aging actress is obviously deliberately hiding her age (and in the case of an extremely young/good-looking actor/model, that's obviously not the case). --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 02:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirect to Jessie (TV series) per above. I wish I had something to add, but everything I would have mentioned has been said already. - Purplewowies (talk) 03:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above, but without prejudice to re-creation once there are reliable independent sources upon which to base a proper biographical article about the subject. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Jessie (TV series) without prejudice per WP:NotJustYet. While his short career is verifiable, it fails WP:ENT, and his lack of coverage fails WP:GNG. We can at least send readers to the one place where he can be sourced in context to his work on that series.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q.
 * Comment - I added an anchor at Jessie (TV series) as a potential redirect target. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice job.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.