Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Griffith




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. There is no point in belaboring this outcome. BD2412 T 01:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Chris Griffith

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Autobiography, written by the subject, and sourced exclusively to pieces written by the subject. There does not seem to be independent coverage meeting WP:GNG/WP:JOURNALIST. MarioGom (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC) This article will be undergoing revisions so please wait - Chris Griffith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisgriffith (talk • contribs) 10:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism,  and Australia. MarioGom (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I would say that what we achieved in Australia in the mid 1980s with PC coax networks and multiuser applications was at the cutting edge of what was available with Novell NetWare networks but you may not regard that as notable - hard for me to judge Chrisgriffith (talk) 13:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place to publish information about yourself. The fact that the subject created it is something that compels us to delete it. If an indepdent editor then wants to come along and build an indepdently sourced article, that can be done, but we cannot have an article created by the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mr Griffith, if you are reading this: I wouldn't put it as strongly as John Pack Lambert, rather autobiographies are "strongly discouraged" (see WP:AB) because of the obvious likelihood of  conflict of interest which impacts on Wikipedia's core policy of  neutrality. To meet Wikipedia's basic requirement of being notable requires evidence (citations) from  reliable sources-- please see  referencing for beginners. Pages should not read like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Please familiarise yourself with WP:GOLDENRULE. Given I am certainly aware of Griffith and his tech reviews I was surprised when I went looking (via Google and Newsbank) to improve the page that I could not find any WP:RSs about him in the hope of fulfilling WP:JOURNALIST. While he may be a long term journalist at The Australian, he still needs to meet WP:JOURNALIST and unfortunately I couldn't find any material to support that. Cabrils (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Nevertheless I really appreciate the effort that you went to Cabrils to improve the page. That's really appreciated. Chrisgriffith (talk) 09:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting platform for vanity spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.