Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Haessig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  00:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Chris Haessig
Delete Only 68 Google hits for Mr. Haessig. The company he worked for fares even worse, with three different defunct websites with only a blank home page being returned by Google. It just barely avoided me sending it to speedy deletion, but I certainly wouldn't object if that happened. Caerwine 22:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7. No claim to notability. -- Saikiri 22:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well that's not true. He claims to be IT director.  If the company is suitably large, then it could be a claim to notoriety. Zordrac 23:07, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * That's the problem. How big can the company be when you have trouble even finding its homepage? -- Saikiri 23:19, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree that its not notable. However, it is incorrect to state that it makes no claims to notoriety.  It does give it a go.  lol.  Hence not a candidate for speedy deletion. Note my delete vote below. Zordrac 23:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Ahh, okie then ;) -- Saikiri~ 23:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - company isn't large. 7 google hits. Couldn't find a company webpage.  Did find 2 listing for it. Here:  and here: .  Also 2 testimonials.  Here:  and here .  Is also confusion because 1 is ophthamlogy (eye doctor) while the other is a type of software!  I am guessing that software would have an IT director, but who knows. Zordrac 23:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.